Meta-analysis of cephabsporins versus penicillin for treatment of group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in adults

66Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (involving 2113 patients) comparing cephalosporins with penicillin for treatment of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis in adults. The summary odds ratio (OR) for bacteriologic cure rate significantly favored cephalosporins, compared with penicillin (OR,1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.44); the bacteriologic failure rate was nearly 2 times higher for penicillin therapy than it was for cephalosporin therapy (P = .00004). The summary OR for clinical cure rate was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.61-3.28), significantly favoring cephalosporins (P < .00001). Sensitivity analyses for bacterial cure significantly favored cephalosporins over penicillin in trials that were double-blinded and of high quality, trials that had a well-defined clinical status, trials that performed GABHS serotyping, trials that eliminated carriers from analysis, and trials that had a test-of-cure culture performed 3-14 days after treatment. This meta-analysis indicates that the likelihood of bacteriologic and clinical failure in the treatment of GABHS tonsillopharyngitis is 2 times higher for oral penicillin than for oral cephalosporins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, J. R., & Pichichero, M. E. (2004). Meta-analysis of cephabsporins versus penicillin for treatment of group a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38(11), 1526–1534. https://doi.org/10.1086/392496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free