Reference values and repeatability of the Schirmer tear tests I and II in domesticated, clinically normal dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius)

4Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine the normal values and repeatability for Schirmer tear test (STT) in clinically normal dromedary camels and to analyze the influence of the age and gender on these values. Animals studied: Thirty clinically normal dromedary camels of different ages (calves, immature, and mature). Procedures: Schirmer tear tests I and II were performed using commercial STT strips. Three measurements were obtained from each eye over three consecutive weeks, and the variance of these measurements was determined. Results: Mean values and coefficient of variation of STT I and STT II for the right and left eyes varied significantly among camel groups (P < 0.05). For STT I, the most frequently recorded values were >14–18, > 22–26, and >30–34 mm/min in calves, immature camels, and mature camels, respectively. For STT II, however, the most frequently recorded values were 7–14, >10–18, and >26–30 mm/min, respectively. The interassay coefficients of variation were 1.7–14.4% and were significantly lower in mature camels than in calves and immature camels (P < 0.05). Age was positively correlated with STT I (r = 0.81) and STT II values (r = 0.88). No significant variations were found between genders. Conclusions: This preliminary study reports STT I and II values and repeatability in normal dromedary camels. This information may assist veterinary practitioners in complete ophthalmic examinations and in accurate diagnosis of ocular surface diseases affecting the tear film in this species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marzok, M. A., Badawy, A. M., & El-khodery, S. A. (2017). Reference values and repeatability of the Schirmer tear tests I and II in domesticated, clinically normal dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius). Veterinary Ophthalmology, 20(3), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free