Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in patients receiving multi-element psychosocial intervention for early psychosis: Results from the GET UP pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

27Citations
Citations of this article
140Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The GET UP multi-element psychosocial intervention proved to be superior to treatment as usual in improving outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). However, to guide treatment decisions, information on which patients may benefit more from the intervention is warranted. Aims To identify patients' characteristics associated with (a) a better treatment response regardless of treatment type (nonspecific predictors), and (b) a better response to the specific treatment provided (moderators). Method Some demographic and clinical variables were selected a priori as potential predictors/moderators of outcomes at 9 months. Outcomes were analysed in mixed-effects random regression models. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01436331.) Results Analyses were performed on 444 patients. Education, duration of untreated psychosis, premorbid adjustment and insight predicted outcomes regardless of treatment. Only age at first contact with the services proved to be a moderator of treatment outcome (patients aged 535 years had greater improvement in psychopathology), thus suggesting that the intervention is beneficial to a broad array of patients with FEP. Conclusions Except for patients aged over 35 years, no specific subgroups benefit more from the multi-element psychosocial intervention, suggesting that this intervention should be recommended to all those with FEP seeking treatment in mental health services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Lenzi, J., Rucci, P., Iozzino, L., Cellini, M., … Ruggeri, M. (2017). Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in patients receiving multi-element psychosocial intervention for early psychosis: Results from the GET UP pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(5), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.190058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free