Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem

  • Blancke S
  • Boudry M
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (2021) 34(3) 183-198
DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2022.2057777
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The demarcation between science and pseudoscience is a long-standing problem in philosophy of science. Although philosophers have been hesitant to engage in this project since Larry Laudan announce...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blancke, S., & Boudry, M. (2021). Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 34(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2022.2057777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free