Comparative effectiveness research in localized prostate cancer treatment

8Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen testing has dramatically increased the incidence of localized prostate cancer. Most men with localized cancer attempt curative therapy, usually with surgery or radiation. However, there is uncertainty about whether and how to best treat these cancers. No published controlled trials have directly compared surgery against radiation or either treatment against active surveillance. Given the indolent nature of prostate cancer and the substantial risks of treatment-related harms, the effects of cancer and treatment on quality of life are important patient-centered outcomes. Comparative effectiveness research, using observational cohorts, claims data and simulation models, enables comparisons of treatments that have not been studied in controlled trials and captures real-world outcomes data to better support informed decision-making. © 2013 Future Medicine Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoffman, R. M., Penson, D. F., Zietman, A. L., & Barry, M. J. (2013). Comparative effectiveness research in localized prostate cancer treatment. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Becaris Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.13.66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free