Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Iranian eyes

58Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We describe corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Iranian eyes and compare endothelial cell characteristics in the Iranian population with data available in the literature for American and Indian populations. Methods: Specular microscopy was performed in 525 eyes of normal Iranian people aged 20 to 85 years old. The studied parameters including mean endothelial cell density (MCD), mean cell area (MCA) and coefficient of variation (CV) in cell area were analyzed in all of the 525 eyes. Results: MCD was 1961 ± 457 cell/mm2 and MCA was 537.0 ± 137.4 μm2. There was no statistically significant difference in MCD, MCA and CV between genders (Student t-test, P = 0.85, P = 0.97 and P = 0.15 respectively). There was a statistically significant decrease in MCD with age (P < 0.001, r = -0.64). The rate of cell loss was 0.6% per year. There was also a statistically significant increase in MCA (P < 0.001,r = 0.56) and CV (P < 0.001, r = 0.30) from 20 to 85 years of age. Conclusion: The first normative data for the endothelium of Iranian eyes seems to confirm that there are no differences in MCD, MCA and CV between genders. Nevertheless, the values obtained in Iranian eyes seem to be different to those reported by the literature in Indian and American populations. © 2006Hashemian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
52Citations
37Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hashemian, M. N., Moghimi, S., Fard, M. A., Fallah, M. R., & Mansouri, M. R. (2006). Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in normal Iranian eyes. BMC Ophthalmology, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-9

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

81%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

16%

Researcher 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

10%

Mathematics 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0