Place vs. Node transit: Planning policies revisited

37Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A core contemporary planning approach is the promotion of transit-oriented developments (TODs) and in recent times cities have committed substantial financial investment to encourage sustainable precincts around public transport. Evaluation of the success of TODs is key for continuing the planning efforts. A frequently applied framework for characterizing TODs draws on Bertolini's Node-Place (N-P) model, enriched through application in various contexts. We offer here an extension to the N-P model, using a case study in a low-density city, Perth,Western Australia. A typology of railway stations is developed using 43 indicators and then linear models are applied to ascertain the association between patronage and station precinct features. The results show that various types of measures are required to increase public transport ridership for the four clusters that emerged from the analysis. Density alone does not lead to increased use of public transport; it must be associated with city-wide accessibility, as well as access/egress to and from the station.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olaru, D., Moncrieff, S., McCarney, G., Sun, Y., Reed, T., Pattison, C., … Biermann, S. (2019). Place vs. Node transit: Planning policies revisited. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020477

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free