Expression and clinical significance of glucose transporter 1 mRNA in bronchial brushing liquid-based cytology specimens from patients with and without lung cancer

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) mRNA expression in bronchial brushing specimens from patients with lung cancer. Methods: GLUT1 mRNA levels were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in SurePath TM liquid-based cytology bronchial brushing specimens from patients with lung cancer (n=76) and benign lung disease (n=154). Results: Compared with patients with benign disease and compared with cytology, GLUT1 mRNA was found significantly more frequently in patients with all carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas and small cell carcinomas, as well as central, peripheral and diffuse carcinomas (P<0.01). Minor differences were noted in GLUT1 mRNA and cytology results between histological types and tumour location but were not statistically significant. The diagnostic performance of RT-PCR analysis of GLUT1 mRNA was significantly higher than cytology in terms of sensitivity (97.4±3.6% versus 65.8±10.7) and negative predictive value (98.6±1.9%, versus 85.6±5.1%) but specificity (90.9±4.5%) and positive predictive value (84.1±7.6%) were lower than cytology (100%). Conclusions: Using liquid-based cytology, RT-PCR can be performed on bronchial brushing specimens to detect GLUT1 mRNA expression, and may be a useful adjunct to cytology diagnosis. It was more sensitive than cytology but its lower specificity should be taken into account. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lv, M., Fan, Y. B., Zhao, Y. J., Wang, T. Y., & Wu, G. P. (2012). Expression and clinical significance of glucose transporter 1 mRNA in bronchial brushing liquid-based cytology specimens from patients with and without lung cancer. Cytopathology, 23(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00846.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free