Belief tracking for planning with sensing: Width, complexity and approximations

40Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider the problem of belief tracking in a planning setting where states are valuations over a set of variables that are partially observable, and beliefs stand for the sets of states that are possible. While the problem is intractable in the worst case, it has been recently shown that in deterministic conformant and contingent problems, belief tracking is exponential in a width parameter that is often bounded and small. In this work, we extend these results in two ways. First, we introduce a width notion that applies to non-deterministic problems as well, develop a factored belief tracking algorithm that is exponential in the problem width, and show how it applies to existing benchmarks. Second, we introduce a meaningful, powerful, and sound approximation scheme, beam tracking, that is exponential in a smaller parameter, the problem causal width, and has much broader applicability. We illustrate the value of this algorithm over large instances of problems such as Battleship, Minesweeper, and Wumpus, where it yields state-of-the-art performance in real-time. © 2014 AI Access Foundation. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonet, B., & Geffner, H. (2014). Belief tracking for planning with sensing: Width, complexity and approximations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 50, 923–970. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.4475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free