Identification of mercurian volcanism: Resolution effects and implications for MESSENGER

26Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The possibility of volcanism on Mercury has been a topic of discussion since Mariner 10 returned images of half the planets surface showing widespread plains material. These plains could be volcanic or lobate crater ejecta. An assessment of the mechanics of the ascent and eruption of magma shows that it is possible to have widespread volcanism, no volcanism on the surface whatsoever, or some range in between. It is difficult to distinguish between a lava flow and lobate crater ejecta based on morphology and morphometry. No definite volcanic features have been identified on Mercury. However, known lunar volcanic features cannot be identified in images with similar resolutions and viewing geometries as the Mariner 10 dataset. Examination of high-resolution, low Sun angle Mariner 10 images reveals several features which are interpreted to be flow fronts; it is unclear if these are volcanic flows or ejecta flows. This analysis implies that a clear assessment of volcanism on Mercury must wait for better data. MESSENGER (Mercury: Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, Ranging) will take images with viewing geometries and resolutions appropriate for the identification of such features.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milkovich, S. M., Head, J. W., & Wilson, L. (2002). Identification of mercurian volcanism: Resolution effects and implications for MESSENGER. Meteoritics and Planetary Science, 37(9), 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb00890.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free