Calculation of equivalent square fields in radiation therapy by an improved Vadash correction factor for collimator exchange effects

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and objectives: To determine the head scatter factor, a formalism presented by Vadash and Bjärngard has been employed to assess collimator exchange effects. The aim of this study was to determine the best Vadash correction factor (A) by introducing a new method based on the output factor measured in air for different square and rectangular fields. Materials and Methods: A new simple mathematical method based on selection of the best dosimetric data was proposed to obtain the A value for Vadash to predict the equivalent square field size. Measurements were performed with a Farmer chamber 0.6 cc in SSD 100 cm and build up cap of Plexiglas, 1.5 and 3.5 cm equal to water, for 6 and 18 MV, respectively, with a Perimus Plus linear accelerator. The output factor in air (OFair) was measured for square and rectangular fields. MATLAB software (version R2014a) was employed for calculations and curve fitting. Results: A power model with a constant value was applied to the output factor in air as a function of square field size. The output factor in air ranged from 0.983 to 1.038 at 6MV and from 0.731 to 1.05 at 18 MV with the Y collimator having a greater effect. Obtained values for A were 1.42 and 1.55 with respect to σmin=0.98 and 2.3 for 6 and 18 MV energies, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed A values minimize the collimator exchange effect in calculating equivalent squares, which plays an important role in patient dose calculation and treatment planning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Birgani, M. J. T., Chegeni, N., Tahmasbi, M., Fayazi, R., Asl, J. F., & Behrouz, M. A. (2018). Calculation of equivalent square fields in radiation therapy by an improved Vadash correction factor for collimator exchange effects. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19(11), 3053–3057. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.11.3053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free