A standard, noninvasive monitoring of hematocrit algorithm improves blood pressure control in pediatric hemodialysis patients

49Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Accurate dry weight assessment is difficult in pediatric hemodialysis patients but is essential to prevent chronic fluid overload, hypertension, and cardiovascular morbidity. A noninvasive monitoring (NIVM) of hematocrit-guided ultrafiltration algorithm was studied prospectively in 20 pediatric hemodialysis patients. The algorithm targeted the first 50% of total goal ultrafiltration to be removed during the first hour of dialysis with a maximum blood volume change of 8 to 12% per hour. The second 50% was removed during the remaining treatment time with a maximum blood volume change of 5% per hour. Data that were collected at baseline and 6 mo included weight, BP, number of antihypertensive medications, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiogram, and ultrafiltration-associated symptoms. Sixteen of 20 enrolled patients completed the study. No difference was seen between baseline and 6-mo weight, predialysis casual BP, nighttime ABPM, or left ventricular mass index. There was a decrease in postdialysis casual systolic BP, daytime ABPM, number of antihypertensive medications prescribed, and rate of intradialytic events related to ultrafiltration (all P ≤ 0.05). Adoption of a standardized NIVM-guided algorithm led to (1) improved ABPM profiles, (2) decreased antihypertensive medication burden, and (3) decreased ultrafiltration-associated symptoms. Wider use of NIVM-guided ultrafiltration may decrease cardiovascular morbidity in pediatric hemodialysis patients. Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, H. P., Goldstein, S. L., Mahan, J. D., Smith, B., Fried, C. B., Currier, H., & Flynn, J. T. (2007). A standard, noninvasive monitoring of hematocrit algorithm improves blood pressure control in pediatric hemodialysis patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2(2), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02410706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free