Factors influencing postoperative adverse events after Hartmann's reversal

29Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim The study was performed to evaluate factors influencing postoperative adverse events after Hartmann's reversal (HR). Method This was a retrospective study of unselected patients who underwent HR after the Hartmann's procedure (HP) for left colonic perforation with peritonitis at a single institution. Data were retrieved from an Institutional Review Board-approved database. The study end-point was postoperative adverse events, which included mortality, complications, reoperations and 30-day readmission. Lag time was defined as the time from HP to HR. The results are expressed as mean±SD. Results From 1997 to 2007, 204 (39.1%) of all patients who underwent the HP [60±16years of age; 58% men; body mass index (BMI)=27.6±5.7; 2% were American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1, 50.2% were ASA 2, 39.9% were ASA 3 and 7.9% were ASA 4) underwent HR at an interval of 158±107days. There were 24 laparoscopic and 180 open HRs, with no deaths. The operating time was 167±64min, estimated blood loss was 245±283ml and the 30-day readmission rate was 4.9%. Eleven (5.4%) patients developed 14 (6.8%) complications and five (2.4%) of these patients required a new stoma at the time of HR or later. On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, chronic renal failure requiring dialysis (OR=21.0; 95% CI: 1.5-284; P=0.02) was significantly associated with increased adverse events. Conclusion The study showed that chronic renal failure requiring dialysis was the only independent predictor of postoperative adverse event rates following HR. © 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okolica, D., Bishawi, M., Karas, J. R., Reed, J. F., Hussain, F., & Bergamaschi, R. (2012). Factors influencing postoperative adverse events after Hartmann’s reversal. Colorectal Disease, 14(3), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02629.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free