“We are all souls”: Dogs, dog-wo/men and borderlands in Coetzee and Tyulkin

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Examining the notion of “dog-men” in Coetzee's Disgrace and Tyulkin's documentary Not about Dogs, I argue that when the main characters become dogmen and dog-women they share with dogs the status of subaltern border-creatures. I view the spaces in the Eastern Cape and eastern Kazakhstan as borderlands which parallel the mythic lands of Dog-men from White's anthropological study Myths of the Dog-man. These spaces of human-dog interactions, in turn, relate to Foucauldian heterotopias as sites that establish alternative modes of power relations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mondry, H. (2018). “We are all souls”: Dogs, dog-wo/men and borderlands in Coetzee and Tyulkin. Tydskrif Vir Letterkunde, 55(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9070/tvl.v.55i3.5508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free