Development and validation of the Post-operative Recovery Index for measuring quality of recovery after surgery

20Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Current methods used to quantify aspects of recovery after surgery and anesthesia tend to be narrowly focused, not patient-rated, or have not been appropriately validated. We set out to develop a quality of recovery score system that is self-report and multi-dimensional, with applicability across various surgeries and surgical settings, from immediately post-surgery through discharge and covering the first 30 days of recovery. Methods: A Post-operative Recovery Index (PoRI) was validated on 225 patients (NValidation=96; NCross Validation=129) who had undergone a surgical procedure within the last 30 days. Domain level internal consistency on the validation and cross validation samples yielded coefficients ranging from r=0.813 to r=0.932, while test-retest reliability yielded stability coefficients ranging from r=0.660 to r=0.881. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated validity of the factorial structure of the 37-item PoRI on the validation patient sample and confirmed on the cross validation patient sample. Exploratory psychometric analyses provided evidence of an overarching (second-order) "Recovery" factor. Results: We developed, tested, validated, and cross validated the Post-operative Recovery Index (PoRI) consisting of 37 items assessing symptomatology a patient may experience after surgery. Conclusion: The PoRI is offered as a valid, multidimensional measure of recovery after surgery and anesthesia with broad applicability in post-surgical settings. © 2012 Butler SF, et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butler, S. F., Black, R. A., Techner, L., Fernandez, K. C., Brooks, D., Wood, M., & Katz, N. (2012). Development and validation of the Post-operative Recovery Index for measuring quality of recovery after surgery. Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000267

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free