Hidden in plain sight: The overstated benefits and underestimated losses of potential implantations associated with advertised PGT-A success rates

Abstract

The utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has understandable intuitive appeal in reassuring the clinician that 'everything possible' has been done to assure the birth of a healthy baby. Whereas the development of the PGT-A technology is still in a relatively early stage, great strides have nevertheless been made in the understanding of the genetics of the preimplantation human embryo. The problem lies not in the progress that has been achieved, but rather, in the reality that PGT-A is being actively marketed as a mature technology. Those that market the technology overstate its benefits and underestimate the losses of potential implantations that are the consequence of the practice of PGT-A. The implication is that the PGT-A technology is accurate, has minimal errors and is ready to be applied to every case of IVF. This approach is not evidence-based. Substantial losses of potential implantations are even evident in the analysis of the numbers presented by marketing materials themselves. In order to provide accurate, evidence-based counseling for patients undergoing IVF, we need to apply an appropriate level of scientific scrutiny to the data that are available and apply PGT-A selectively to those cases in which the benefits clearly outweigh the costs.