Performance of self-collected saliva testing compared with nasopharyngeal swab testing for the detection of sars-cov-2

13Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether self-collected pure saliva (SCPS) is comparable to nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in asymptomatic, mild patients with confirmed COVID-19. Thirty-one patients aged from 18 to 85 years were included between 9 June and 11 December 2020. A SCPS sample and a NP sample were taken for each patient. Quantitative PCR was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Results of SCPS vs. NP samples testing were compared. Statistical analyses were performed. Viral load was significantly correlated (r = 0.72). The concordance probability was estimated at 73.3%. In symptomatic adults, SCPS performance was similar to that of NP swabs (Percent Agreement = 74.1%; p = 0.11). Thus, the salivary test based on pure oral saliva samples easily obtained by noninvasive techniques has a fair agreement with the nasopharyngeal one in asymptomatic, mild patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrouel, F., Valette, M., Perrier, H., Bouscambert-Duchamp, M., Dussart, C., Tramini, P., & Bourgeois, D. (2021). Performance of self-collected saliva testing compared with nasopharyngeal swab testing for the detection of sars-cov-2. Viruses, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050895

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free