Incidence of the myelodysplastic syndromes using a novel claims-based algorithm: High number of uncaptured cases by cancer registries

189Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are hematologically diverse hematopoietic stem cell malignancies primarily affecting older individuals. The incidence of MDS in the United States is estimated at 3.3 per 100 000; however, evidence suggests underreporting of MDS to centralized cancer registries. Contrary to clinical recommendations, registry guidelines from 2001-2010 required the capture of only one malignancy in the myeloid lineage and did not require blood count (BC) or bone marrow (BM) biopsy for MDS confirmation. To address these potential limitations, we constructed 4 claims-based algorithms to assess MDS incidence, applied the algorithms to the 2000-2008 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, and assessed algorithm validity using SEER-registered MDS cases. Each algorithm required one or more MDS claims and accounted for recommended diagnostic services during the year before the first claim: 1+, 2+, 2 + BC, and 2 + BCBM (ordered by sensitivity). Each had moderate sensitivities (78.05%-92.90%) and high specificities (98.49%-99.84%), with the 2 + BCBM algorithm demonstrating the highest specificity. Based on the 2 + BCBM algorithm, the annual incidence of MDS is 75 per 100 000 persons 65 years or older - much higher than the 20 per 100 000 reported by SEER using the same sample. © 2011 by The American Society of Hematology.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cogle, C. R., Craig, B. M., Rollison, D. E., & List, A. F. (2011). Incidence of the myelodysplastic syndromes using a novel claims-based algorithm: High number of uncaptured cases by cancer registries. Blood, 117(26), 7121–7125. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-02-337964

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

48%

Researcher 24

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 49

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 13

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free