Evidence for the Benefits of State Prekindergarten Programs: Myth & Misrepresentation

  • Farran D
  • Lipsey M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2014, New York City launched the historic Pre-K for All program, which massively expanded early education for children in the city. The state followed suit with a budgetary pledge of some $1.5 billion over 5 years to implement full-day universal prekindergarten (pre-K) statewide. Many other states have implemented or expanded state-funded pre-K programs in the last decade, encouraged by claims about expected benefits. However, there is remarkably little scientifically rigorous evidence for these benefits. Claims of pre-K success rely largely on small, experimental, model programs run 50 or more years ago—programs that bear little resemblance to current pre-K implementations. Evidence for program effectiveness is crucial given the current interest in and expansion of state-funded pre-K programs. This review of the evidence raises serious questions about the presumed benefits of state pre-K programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farran, D. C., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016). Evidence for the Benefits of State Prekindergarten Programs: Myth & Misrepresentation. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151600200103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free