Forms of subjectivation and precariousness of life: Contradictions in rural settings

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This theoretical paper aims to examine some of the interfaces between rural settings and the field of mental health. First, living conditions in rural regions will be discussed, exploring rurality from a perspective of vulnerability and its impact on psychological health. Next, we will expand this approach by analyzing other analytical perspectives, namely Judith Butler's (2018) essay on the precariousness of life and Mbembe's (2018) necropolitics. Finally, this paper seeks to contribute to research on the living conditions and mental health of rural populations, and to promote territorial practices. Consideration will also be given to the specific lifestyles and needs of this community-without disregarding deteriorating conditions of inequality and insecurity arising from the conservative political discourse underway in our society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dimenstein, M., Dantas, C., Leite, J. F., Neto, M. C., & Landini, F. (2019). Forms of subjectivation and precariousness of life: Contradictions in rural settings. Estudos de Psicologia, 24(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20190010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free