Comparison of Online-Onboard Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy with Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Patients with Gynecologic Tumors in Dependence on Fractionation and the Planning Target Volume Margin

22Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical carcinomas or recurrences after surgery undergoing radiochemotherapy whose tumor is unsuited for a brachytherapy boost need high-dose percutaneous radiotherapy with small margins to compensate for clinical target volume deformations and set-up errors. Cone-beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has the potential to reduce planning target volume (PTV) margins below 5 mm for these tumors. Objective: To compare online ART technologies with image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for gynecologic tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study comprised all 7 consecutive patients with gynecologic tumors who were treated with ART with artificial intelligence segmentation from January to May 2022 at the West German Cancer Center. All adapted treatment plans were reviewed for the new scenario of organs at risk and target volume. Dose distributions of adapted and scheduled plans optimized on the initial planning computed tomography scan were compared. Exposure: Online ART for gynecologic tumors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Target dose coverage with ART compared with IGRT for PTV margins of 5 mm or less in terms of the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) without increasing the gEUD for the organs at risk (bladder and rectum). Results: The first 10 treatment series among 7 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [16.5] years) with gynecologic tumors from a prospective observational trial performed with ART were compared with IGRT. For a clinical PTV margin of 5 mm, IGRT was associated with a median gEUD decrease in the interfractional clinical target volume of -1.5% (90% CI, -31.8% to 2.9%) for all fractions in comparison with the planned dose distribution. Online ART was associated with a decrease of -0.02% (90% CI, -3.2% to 1.5%), which was less than the decrease with IGRT (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guberina, M., Santiago Garcia, A., Khouya, A., Pöttgen, C., Holubyev, K., Ringbaek, T. P., … Guberina, N. (2023). Comparison of Online-Onboard Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy with Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Patients with Gynecologic Tumors in Dependence on Fractionation and the Planning Target Volume Margin. JAMA Network Open, 6(3), E234066. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free