Thermal perception thresholds: Assessing the level of human spinal cord injury

27Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study design: Controlled, cross-sectional, observational. Objectives: To investigate whether quantitative sensory testing (QST) is able to reveal subclinical deficits at the neurological level of lesion in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital and Imperial College London, UK. Methods: QST and clinical assessments were carried out on 18 subjects with complete SCI (American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade A) and 10 subjects with incomplete SCI (ASIA grades B, C or D). A total of 10 healthy subjects acted as controls. Results: At the level of lesion perceptual thresholds to monofilaments, cold pain and heat pain were similar to values in control subjects but cool and warm thresholds were significantly raised. A correlation between cool and warm thresholds was observed at the level of lesion in complete SCI and between heat and cold pain thresholds at the level of lesion in complete SCI, incomplete SCI and in control subjects. In the zone of partial preservation in complete SCI and below the level of lesion in incomplete SCI, thresholds for all modalities were all different compared to controls. Conclusion: QST reveals impaired thermal sensation in dermatomes clinically defined as normal with ASIA standards. Quantitative thermal testing therefore permits a discriminating assessment of preserved sensation and subclinical deficit and has the potential to improve upon the clinical detection of natural recovery or changes in level of injury following interventions designed to repair SCI. Sponsorship: The International Spinal Research Trust. © 2006 International Spinal Cord Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicotra, A., & Ellaway, P. H. (2006). Thermal perception thresholds: Assessing the level of human spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 44(10), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101877

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free