Comparing the similarity of statistical shape models using the bhattacharya metric

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A variety of different methods of finding correspondences across sets of images to build statistical shape models have been proposed, each of which is likely to result in a different model. When dealing with large datasets (particularly in 3D), it is difficult to evaluate the quality of the resulting models. However, if the different methods are successfully modelling the true underlying shape variation, the resulting models should be similar. If two different techniques lead to similar models, it suggests that they are indeed approximating the true shape change. In this paper we explore a method of comparing statistical shape models by evaluating the Bhattacharya overlap between their implied shape distributions. We apply the technique to investigate the similarity of three models of the same 3D dataset constructed using different methods. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babalola, K. O., Cootes, T. F., Patenaude, B., Rao, A., & Jenkinson, M. (2006). Comparing the similarity of statistical shape models using the bhattacharya metric. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4190 LNCS-I, pp. 142–150). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11866565_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free