Pharmacological management of acute myocardial infarction in the municipal district of Rio de Janeiro.

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CONTEXT: International studies have shown a large variation in the utilization patterns of interventions, in acute myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: To analyze utilization patterns of pharmacological interventions in acute myocardial infarction and their corresponding effects on hospital mortality. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LOCAL: Hospitals of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) in the municipal district of Rio de Janeiro. SAMPLE: A stratified hospital sample of 391 medical records selected from the 1,936 admissions registered in the SUS Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS) with a main diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, in the studied district in 1997. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Sex, age, time to treatment, risk factors, severity factors, diagnosis confirmation, use of pharmacological interventions, hospital death, contraindication of the use of thrombolytic therapy, contraindication of aspirin use. RESULTS: We reviewed 98.2% of the sampled medical records. Acute myocardial infarction diagnosis was confirmed in 91.7% (95% CI 88.3 to 94.2). 61.5% were men and 38.5% women, with an average age of 60.2 years (SD 2.4). The median time interval between symptom onset and hospital admission was 11 hours. Hospital mortality was 20.6% (95% CI 16.7 to 25.0). Intravenous thrombolytic therapy was used in 19.5% (95% CI 15.8 to 23.9) of the cases; aspirin in 86.5% (95% CI 82.5 to 89.6); beta-blockers in 49.0% (95% CI 43.8 to 54.1); angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in 63.3% (95% CI 58.2 to 68.1); nitrates in 82.0% (95% CI 82.4 to 89.6); heparin in 81.3% (95% CI 76.9 to 85.0); calcium antagonists in 30.5% (95% CI 26.0 to 35.4). There was a significant variation in the use of thrombolytic therapy, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists and heparin among hospitals of different juridical nature. CONCLUSIONS: There was underutilization of some interventions with well-established efficacy (thrombolytic therapy, aspirin, beta-blockers and intravenous nitrates). The use of calcium antagonists, not supported by scientific evidence in acute myocardial infarction, was quite frequent. A logistic model documented the benefit of aspirin, beta-blockers and ACE inhibitor use in reducing the chance of hospital death.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Escosteguy, C. C., Portela, M. C., Leite de Vasconcellos, M. T., & de Andrade Medronho, R. (2001). Pharmacological management of acute myocardial infarction in the municipal district of Rio de Janeiro. São Paulo Medical Journal = Revista Paulista de Medicina, 119(6), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802001000600003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free