Comparison of passive ranging integral imaging and active imaging digital holography for three-dimensional object recognition

64Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present an overview of three-dimensional (3D) object recognition techniques that use active sensing by interferometric imaging (digital holography) and passive sensing by integral imaging. We describe how each technique can be used to retrieve the depth information of a 3D scene and how this information can then be used for 3D object recognition. We explore various algorithms for 3D recognition such as nonlinear correlation and target distortion tolerance. We also provide a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques. © 2004 Optical Society of America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frauel, Y., Tajahuerce, E., Matoba, O., Castro, A., & Javidi, B. (2004, January 10). Comparison of passive ranging integral imaging and active imaging digital holography for three-dimensional object recognition. Applied Optics. OSA - The Optical Society. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.000452

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free