Abstract
Purpose. Political, national, religious, and other motivations have led the media and even scientists to errantly accept extreme longevity claims prima facie. We describe various causes of false claims of extraordinary longevity. Design and Methods. American Social Security Death Index files for the period 19802009 were queried for individuals with birth and death dates yielding ages 110+ years of age. Frequency was compared to a list of age-validated supercentenarians maintained by the Gerontology Research Group who died during the same time period. Age claims of 110+ years and the age validation experiences of the authors facilitated a list of typologies of false age claims. Results. Invalid age claim rates increase with age from 65 at age 110-111 to 98 by age 115 to 100 for 120+ years. Eleven typologies of false claims were: Religious Authority Myth, Village Elder Myth, Fountain of Youth Myth (substance), Shangri-La Myth (geographic), Nationalist Pride, Spiritual Practice, Familial Longevity, Individual and/or Family Notoriety, Military Service, Administrative Entry Error, and Pension-Social Entitlement Fraud. Conclusions. Understanding various causes of false extreme age claims is important for placing current, past, and future extreme longevity claims in context and for providing a necessary level of skepticism. © 2010 Robert D. Young et al.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Perls, T. T., Young, R. D., Desjardins, B., McLaughlin, K., & Poulain, M. (2010). Typologies of extreme longevity myths. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/423087
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.