Increasingly polarised or finding common ground? Exploring pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric on two South African Facebook pages

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric on two South African Facebook pages to identify the nature, sources and justifications of the vaccine-related claims published on these pages. Our dataset consisted of 440 Facebook posts made by page administrators during 2019. Statements related to the safety and necessity of vaccines dominated the pro-vaccine page, while the anti-vaccine page focussed primarily on claims about the dangers of vaccines. Posts on both pages frequently contained content shared from within Facebook, with much of the content originating from the United States. Both pages made equal use of scientific justifications (i.e. published journal articles) to support claims, and most of these articles were published in accredited journals. The authors hope that a better understanding of the nature, sources and justifications of pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric may lead to more constructive dialogue about vaccines, including the ongoing debate about COVID-19 vaccines

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Connoway, K., Keal, H., van Lill, M., & Joubert, M. (2022). Increasingly polarised or finding common ground? Exploring pro and anti-vaccine rhetoric on two South African Facebook pages. Journal of Science Communication, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.21050204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free