Higher organism load associated with failure of azithromycin to treat rectal chlamydia

32Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Repeat rectal chlamydia infection is common in men who have sex with men (MSM) following treatment with 1 g azithromycin. This study describes the association between organism load and repeat rectal chlamydia infection, genovar distribution, and efficacy of azithromycin in asymptomatic MSM. Stored rectal chlamydia-positive samples from MSM were analysed for organism load and genotyped to assist differentiation between reinfection and treatment failure. Included men had follow-up tests within 100 days of index infection. Lymphogranuloma venereum and proctitis diagnosed symptomatically were excluded. Factors associated with repeat infection, treatment failure and reinfection were investigated. In total, 227 MSM were included - 64 with repeat infections [28.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 22.4-34.5]. Repeat positivity was associated with increased pre-treatment organism load [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2]. Of 64 repeat infections, 29 (12.8%, 95% CI 8.7-17.8) were treatment failures and 35 (15.4%, 95% CI 11.0-20.8) were reinfections, 11 (17.2%, 95% CI 8.9-28.7) of which were definite reinfections. Treatment failure and reinfection were both associated with increased load (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.7 and 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2, respectively). The most prevalent genovars were G, D and J. Treatment efficacy for 1 g azithromycin was 83.6% (95% CI 77.2-88.8). Repeat positivity was associated with high pre-treatment organism load. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to evaluate azithromycin's efficacy and whether extended doses can overcome rectal infections with high organism load.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kong, F. Y. S., Tabrizi, S. N., Fairley, C. K., Phillips, S., Fehler, G., Law, M., … Hocking, J. S. (2016). Higher organism load associated with failure of azithromycin to treat rectal chlamydia. Epidemiology and Infection, 144(12), 2587–2596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free