Recovery or reorganisation? Long-term increases in riverine taxonomic and functional diversity are confounded by compositional dynamics

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When evaluating biological recovery, shifts in species identity such as non-native status, specialisation, and functional traits should be examined alongside changes in species richness. Lithuania, an ecologically overlooked region, serves as a crucial reservoir for boreal and glacial relict macroinvertebrates. We investigate how and why Lithuanian riverine communities have changed during the intensive period of global environmental changes from 2010 to 2020. Using 41 time-series from Lithuanian rivers, we identified changes in taxonomic and functional diversity. Akin to biological recovery, we observed an overall increase in both taxonomic and functional diversity, likely due to improved water quality, evidenced by increased dissolved oxygen levels and reductions in toxic nitrogen and phosphorus products. However, increases in the richness and abundance of insect and indicator taxa were superseded by increases in non-insect taxa, including crustaceans, molluscs, and annelids. These compositional changes were attributed to climatic changes, notably rising temperatures and reduced discharge. Biodiversity responses to environmental changes were stronger in larger rivers, which are economically important and represent sentinels for further upstream changes. While improvements in water quality benefit various stakeholders and should continue, prioritising mitigation of global environmental change should be the top priority for global cooperation and management schemes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, N. J., Pilotto, F., Welti, E. A. R., Osadčaja, D., & Palinauskas, V. (2025). Recovery or reorganisation? Long-term increases in riverine taxonomic and functional diversity are confounded by compositional dynamics. Hydrobiologia, 852(7), 1693–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05665-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free