Energy expenditure in free-living Japanese people with obesity and type 2 diabetes, measured using the doubly-labeled water method

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We determined the total energy expenditure (TEE) of healthy overweight or obese people, and those with impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glycemia (IGT/IFG), or type 2 diabetes (T2DM) using the doubly-labeled water method. As a second purpose, we compared the measured TEE with the target energy intake recommended in the treatment guidelines for diabetes. The participants were normal glucose tolerance (NGT), and IGT/IFG (n511) and T2DM (n59) patients, who were 50–59 y and had a body mass index >25 kg/m2. The median TEE/body mass (BM) values were 32.6, 33.3, and 34.4 kcal/ kg BM and the TEE/target BM values (target BM: BM at a BMI of 22 kg/m2) were 43.7, 50.2, and 46.5 kcal/kg target BM for each group, respectively, and did not differ significantly among them. Obese Japanese participants with T2DM in this study had lower TEE/BM than previously studied in non-obese participants with T2DM. In IGT/IFG or T2DM patients, if 30 kcal/kg target BM was used as the energy coefficient, on the basis of the treatment guidelines, the difference between TEE and the target energy intake would be 21,1746552 kcal (238611%). When 35 kcal/kg target BM was used as the energy coefficient, the difference between TEE and the target energy intake would be 28776542 kcal (227613%). Thus, the energy coefficients used to estimate target energy intake during lifestyle modification in obese/overweight patients with T2DM are considered to be quite low during the first step of diet therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishikawa-Takata, K., Tanaka, S., Park, J., Miyachi, M., Morita, A., Aiba, N., & Watanabe, S. (2020). Energy expenditure in free-living Japanese people with obesity and type 2 diabetes, measured using the doubly-labeled water method. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 66(4), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.66.319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free