Effect of early-onset sepsis evaluations on in-hospital breastfeeding practices among asymptomatic term neonates

59Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of separation for early-onset sepsis (EOS) evaluations due to perinatal risk factors on breastfeeding practices among asymptomatic term newborns. METHODS: This observational study included 692 nulliparous women with term, singleton uncomplicated pregnancies who intended to breastfeed and whose infants were well appearing at birth. We examined the rate of early breastfeeding initiation (within 2 hours of birth) and formula supplementation (in the first 24 hours) among this mother-infant cohort. RESULTS: Asymptomatic infants separated for EOS evaluation within 2 hours of birth were more likely to have delayed initiation of breastfeeding (46.5% vs 12.5%; P 1.5 hours with their mothers. In bivariate analysis, both separation and initiation were associated with formula supplementation. After adjusting for confounders, only delayed initiation remained significantly associated with supplementation (aOR: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.1-3.5]; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Early separation of asymptomatic infants from their mothers for EOS evaluation was significantly associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding, which in turn was associated with increased formula supplementation in the first day of life. This unintended consequence of EOS evaluations among asymptomatic infants may be minimized by delaying early separation for performance of the evaluation, attempting breastfeeding initiation before separation, and/or applying more efficient criteria for identifying infants requiring evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukhopadhyay, S., Lieberman, E. S., Puopolo, K. M., Riley, L. E., & Johnson, L. C. (2015). Effect of early-onset sepsis evaluations on in-hospital breastfeeding practices among asymptomatic term neonates. Hospital Pediatrics, 5(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2014-0126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free