Comparative study between larval surveys and ovitraps to monitor populations of Aedes aegypti

58Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study compares two techniques for detecting the presence of Aedes aegypti: larval surveys and the oviposition trap. In two areas of the municipality of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil were investigated 5,026 households. Larval surveys and oviposition traps were used simultaneously in these households. Different positivity levels (larvae and/or eggs) were detected between and within the two areas. However, only the use of the oviposition trap detected a significant statistical difference between the areas (z = 9,520, p < 0.001). Comparison of the Breteau, Household and Oviposition Indices reveals greater power of detection of positivity in the oviposition trap. There were prevalence ratios of positivity for oviposition trap of 3.4 and 2.1 (for areas 1 and 2 respectively) when compared with larval surveys. The oviposition trap proved to be an economical and operationally viable method, and the most effective in the surveillance of this species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braga, I. A., Gomes, A. C., Nelson, M., Mello, R. C., Bergamaschi, D. P., & de Souza, J. M. (2000). Comparative study between larval surveys and ovitraps to monitor populations of Aedes aegypti. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 33(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0037-86822000000400003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free