The persisted effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment task-specific induced hand recovery following subacute stroke: Extended study

9Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To examine the long-term effects of the low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFrTMS) combined with task-specific training on paretic hand function following subacute stroke. Methods Sixteen participants were randomly selected and grouped into two: the experimental group (real LFrTMS) and the control group (sham LF-rTMS). All the 16 participants were then taken through a 1-hour taskspecific training of the paretic hand. The corticospinal excitability (motor evoke potential [MEP] amplitude) of the non-lesioned hemisphere, and the paretic hand performance (Wolf Motor Function Test total movement time [WMFT-TMT]) were evaluated at baseline, after the LF-rTMS, immediately after task-specific training, 1 and 2 weeks after the training. Results Groups comparisons showed a significant difference in the MEP after LF-rTMS and after the training. Compared to the baseline, the MEP of the experimental group significantly decreased after LF-rTMS and after the training and that effect was maintained for 2 weeks. Group comparisons showed significant difference in WMFT-TMT after the training. Only in the experimental group, the WMFT-TMT of the can lifting item significantly reduced compared to the baseline and the effect was sustained for 2 weeks. Conclusion The results of this study established that the improvement in paretic hand after task-specific training was enhanced by LF-rTMS and it persisted for at least 2 weeks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tretriluxana, J., Thanakamchokchai, J., Jalayondeja, C., Pakaprot, N., & Tretriluxana, S. (2018). The persisted effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment task-specific induced hand recovery following subacute stroke: Extended study. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(6), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.6.777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free