Why are viral genomes so fragile? The bottleneck hypothesis

9Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

If they undergo new mutations at each replication cycle, why are RNA viral genomes so fragile, with most mutations being either strongly deleterious or lethal? Here we provide theoretical and numerical evidence for the hypothesis that genetic fragility is partly an evolutionary response to the multiple population bottlenecks experienced by viral populations at various stages of their life cycles. Modelling within-host viral populations as multi-type branching processes, we show that mutational fragility lowers the rate at which Muller's ratchet clicks and increases the survival probability through multiple bottlenecks. In the context of a susceptible- exposed-infectious-recovered epidemiological model, we find that the attack rate of fragile viral strains can exceed that of more robust strains, particularly at low infectivities and high mutation rates. Our findings highlight the importance of demographic events such as transmission bottlenecks in shaping the genetic architecture of viral pathogens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merleau, N. S. C., Pénisson, S., Gerrish, P. J., Elena, S. F., & Smerlak, M. (2021). Why are viral genomes so fragile? The bottleneck hypothesis. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free