Abstract
We compared patient-reported outcomes of the Kinemax fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to the fixed- or the mobile-bearing prosthesis via a sealed envelope method after the bone cuts had been made in the operating theatre. Randomisation was stratified by centre and diagnosis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at eight to 12 weeks, one year and two years post-operatively. Validated questionnaires were used which included the Western Ontario MacMasters University, Short-Form 12, Mental Health Index-5, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Knee-Related Quality of Life and Function in Sport and Recreation scales and a validated scale of satisfaction post-operatively. In total, 242 patients (250 knees) with a mean age of 68 years (40 to 80) were recruited from four NHS orthopaedic centres. Of these, 132 patients (54.5%) were women.No statistically significant differences could be identified in any of the patient-reported outcome scores between patients who received the fixed-bearing or the mobile-bearing knee up to two-years post-operatively.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wylde, V., Learmonth, I., Potter, A., Bettinson, K., & Lingard, E. (2008). Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 90-B(9), 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b9.21031
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.