Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues

149Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In separate experiments, counterpredictive arrow, eye gaze, or abrupt-onset cues were used to test the hypothesis that individual differences in voluntary control influence involuntary orienting. In contrast with previous findings (Friesen, Ristic, & Kingstone, 2004), involuntary orienting effects were found for arrow cues. Furthermore, for both eye gaze and arrow cues, individual differences in voluntary control were associated with involuntary orienting: Involuntary orienting effects were larger for participants who were more effective at using the cue to reorient attention, and also for participants who reported greater ability to control attention. Orienting to abrupt-onset cues was not correlated to individual differences in self-reported attentional control. The findings show that eye gaze and arrow cues instigate similar involuntary and voluntary effects and that involuntary orienting to symbolic cues is linked to individual differences in voluntary control. Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tipples, J. (2008). Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.77

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free