Variants associated with common disease are not unusually differentiated in frequency across populations

42Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Genetic variants that contribute to risk of common disease may differ in frequency across populations more than random variants in the genome do, perhaps because they have been exposed to population-specific natural selection. To assess this hypothesis empirically, we analyzed data from two groups of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have shown reproducible (n = 9) or reported (n = 39) associations with common diseases. We compared the frequency differentiation (between Europeans and Africans) of the disease-associated SNPs with that of random SNPs in the genome. These common-disease-associated SNPs are not significantly more differentiated across populations than random SNPs. Thus, for the data examined here, ethnicity will not be a good predictor of genotype at many common-disease-associated SNPs, just as it is rarely a good predictor of genotype at random SNPs in the genome. © 2005 by The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lohmueller, K. E., Mauney, M. M., Reich, D., & Braverman, J. M. (2006). Variants associated with common disease are not unusually differentiated in frequency across populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 78(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/499287

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free