Discriminative vs motivational interpretations of avoidance extinction: Extensions to learned helplessness

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Resistance to extinction of discriminated barpress avoidance in rats was assessed through the use of three procedures, each of which served to break the response-reinforcement contingency, classical extinction (CE), operant extinction (OE), and a variable-ratio shock schedule (VR). Greatest resistance to extinction was found for the VR group, followed by OE and then by CE Ss. thus supporting a discriminative rather than a motivational analysis. Reacquisition rates following extinction suggested evidence of "learned helplessness" in some Ss exposed to noncontingent CS-US presentations. © 1973 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheuer, C., & Sutton, C. O. (1973). Discriminative vs motivational interpretations of avoidance extinction: Extensions to learned helplessness. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1(3), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free