Teachers' knowledge concerning dental trauma and its management in primary schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Objectives: The main aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess knowledge concerning traumatic dental injuries and their management among primary schoolteachers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of gender, nationality, marital status, school type, geographical area, age group, level of education and years of experience on teachers' knowledge. Methodology: Data were collected, through a self-administered questionnaire, from both male and female teachers employed in public and private primary schools in the five geographical areas of Riyadh City. The total sample size was 1,520 teachers. Data were entered into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Frequencies and percentages were calculated. An independent t-test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to calculate significance. Results: The total score for the questions assessing knowledge was calculated out of 9, and the highest score was 7 with an average score of 2.85. Over half of the sampled participants stated that they did not know how to manage soft-tissue injuries. Regarding the management of fractured teeth, 38.8% believed that the fractured part is useless; and for the management of an avulsed permanent tooth, only 6.2% of the respondents selected the correct answer. For the question regarding suitable storage medium of an avulsed tooth, only 19.7% chose milk and 3.2% chose the injured person's saliva. Teachers between 41 and 50 years of age and those with longer years of experience had the highest level of knowledge. Teachers in the north area of Riyadh had a higher level of knowledge than teachers in other areas. Conclusion: There was a lack of knowledge among primary schoolteachers in Riyadh concerning traumatic dental injuries and their management. Statistically significant differences were found among geographical areas, age groups and years of experience; no statistically significant differences were found regarding gender, nationality, marital status, level of education and school type (public/private).