GQ and schnorr identification schemes: Proofs of security against impersonation under active and concurrent attacks

218Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Guillou-Quisquater (GQ) and Schnorr identification schemes are amongst the most efficient and best-known Fiat-Shamir follow-ons, but the question of whether they can be proven secure against impersonation under active attack has remained open. This paper provides such a proof for GQ based on the assumed security of RSA under one more inversion, an extension of the usual one-wayness assumption that was introduced in [5]. It also provides such a proof for the Schnorr scheme based on a corresponding discrete-log related assumption. These are the first security proofs for these schemes under assumptions related to the underlying one-way functions. Both results extend to establish security against impersonation under concurrent attack.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellare, M., & Palacio, A. (2002). GQ and schnorr identification schemes: Proofs of security against impersonation under active and concurrent attacks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2442, pp. 162–177). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45708-9_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free