Catheter inside the right heart for 22 years: To intervene or not to intervene?

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Treatment of a central venous catheter emboli that has been asymptomatic for a number of years is controversial. A 56-yearold male patient who had an operation for sinus Valsalva aneurism rupture 22 years ago was referred to cardiology department for routine control. He had a mass inside the right heart on echocardiographic examination, and computed tomography revealed that this mass was an embolic piece of catheter. Catheters that have stayed inside the heart for a long time are removed due to the risk of distal embolisation and endocarditis, but the risk of removal is not known. Non-invasive follow-up of asymptomatic patients is often preferred because of the stabilisation of the embolised catheter due to endothelisation and the risk of complications during removal. Treatment of patients with catheter-piece emboli who are asymptomatic should be individualised, taking into account the risk of thrombosis, arrhythmia, and infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çimen, T., Doʇan, M., Akyel, A., & Yeter, E. (2015). Catheter inside the right heart for 22 years: To intervene or not to intervene? Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 11(1), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2015.49189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free