Overlapping Surgeries Are Not Associated with Worse Patient Outcomes: Retrospective Multivariate Analysis of 14 872 Neurosurgical Cases Performed at a Single Institution

33Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND Overlapping surgeries have recently become a controversial topic. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of overlapping surgeries on patient outcomes. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all neurosurgical procedures performed at a single institution from July 2013 to May 2016 was conducted. Variables extracted from the electronic medical records included sex, age, procedure type, resident years of training, evening case, emergency case, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score, illness severity, mortality risk, and percentage of case overlap. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following primary outcomes: procedure length, length of hospital stay, return to operating room (OR), disposition upon discharge, hospital readmission, and mortality. Separate analyses were performed for overlap thresholds of 0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%. RESULTS A total of 14 872 cases were performed during the study period, and all were included in the statistical analyses. Univariate analysis showed a benefit for overlapping surgeries in terms of hospital length of stay, return to OR, and disposition status (all P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bohl, M. A., Mooney, M. A., Sheehy, J. P., Cantwell, A. M., Chang, S. W., Chapple, K. M., … Spetzler, R. F. (2018). Overlapping Surgeries Are Not Associated with Worse Patient Outcomes: Retrospective Multivariate Analysis of 14 872 Neurosurgical Cases Performed at a Single Institution. Clinical Neurosurgery, 83(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx472

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free