Identification of opinion difference in teaching learning methods and recommendation to faculty

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Today’s teaching learning process in education comprises variety of tools and techniques. A large number of active learning strategies are identified to make the student active and engaging. In spite of these developments, conventional style of passive teaching also exists. Research reviews ensure the fact that the practice of the active learning strategies engage the students positively and promote their performance. There is a concern whether the strategies are practiced rightly and always been a success. The inclusion of active learning strategies by the teachers is always made with the assumption that all the students enjoy and get engaged in learning. Is it the truth really? This research work attempts to find the difference in the perspectives of students and teachers in practicing different active learning methodologies. Few commonly used teaching learning strategies are identified, practiced and reviewed by a set of teachers and the students. The analysis of the obtained data reveals the existence of gap between their perspectives and indicates the need of adopting suitable pedagogy in implementing those strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anitha, D., Kavitha, D., Rajan Prakash, R., & Charles Raja, S. (2020). Identification of opinion difference in teaching learning methods and recommendation to faculty. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33(Special Issue), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free