MATCHING UNDER NONINDEPENDENT VARIABLE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF DRUG REINFORCEMENT

Abstract

Response‐contingent deliveries of oral pentobarbital maintained responding of 3 rhesus monkeys during daily 3‐hr sessions. Deliveries of pentobarbital were arranged under nonindependent concurrent variable‐ratio variable‐ratio schedules. Responses to either schedule counted toward completion of both variable‐ratio schedule requirements. This schedule is similar in some respects to conventional concurrent variable‐interval variable‐interval schedules, in which passage of time counts toward completion of the interval value on both schedules. Restricted nonindependent concurrent variable‐ratio variable‐ratio schedules were also studied. On that schedule, when a drug delivery was assigned to one spout, it had to be collected before responses on the opposite spout again counted toward completion of the schedule requirements. Relative reinforcer magnitude was varied by changing the drug concentration on one schedule while keeping the drug concentration constant on the other variable‐ratio schedule. Under both types of concurrent variable‐ratio variable‐ratio schedules, the relative rate of responding corresponded to the relative drug intake. Unlike earlier studies of concurrent variable‐interval variable‐interval intravenous cocaine reinforcement, preference was proportionate to concentration, and exclusive preferences did not develop. The relationship between relative rate of responding and relative drug intake was well described by the generalized matching law.