Abstract
We studied transposition in pigeons, using multiple-pair discrimination training. Four birds discriminated two pairs of circles: 1+2- and 5+6- or 1-2+ and 5-6+ (digits denote circle diameters and plus and minus signs denote reward and nonreward, respectively). Four other birds discriminated four pairs of circles: 1+2-, 1+3-, 4+6-, and 5+6- or 1-2+, 1-3+, 4-6+, and 5-6+. Finally, 4 birds discriminated only one pair of circles: 1+2-, 1-2+, 5+6-, or 5-6+. Testing included five new pairs-1/5, 2/3, 2/6, 3/4, and 4/5-that distinguished absolute from relational accounts of transposition. The pigeons' relational responding rose from one- to two- to four-pair training. The similarity of the testing stimuli to one another also affected relational responding: Transposition increased with highly dissimilar stimuli. Neither Spence's (1937) theory nor existing relational accounts could predict the obtained pattern of relational responding. Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2005). Transposition in pigeons: Reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training. Learning and Behavior. Psychonomic Society Inc. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196048
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.