Magnetic stimulation for female patients with stress urinary incontinence, a meta-analysis of studies with short-term follow-up

25Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: To determine the efficacy of magnetic stimulation (MS) in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by performing a meta-analysis on peer-reviewed randomized controlled trails (RCTs). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were retrieved for any peer-reviewed original articles in English. Databases were searched up to July 2018. Included studies investigated effects of MS on SUI. The data were analyzed by review manager 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Results: A total of 4 studies involving 232 patients were identified and included in present meta-analysis. Compared with the sham stimulation, the MS group had statistically significantly fewer leaks/3 days (MD=-1.42; 95%CI: -2.42 to -0.59; P=.007), less urine loss on pad test (g.)/24h (MD=-4.99; 95%CI: -8.46 to -1.53; P=.005), higher QoL scores (MD=0.42; 95%CI: 0.02-0.82; P=.009), and lower ICIQ scores (MD=-4.60; 95%CI: -5.02 to -4.19; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, L., Zeng, X., Shen, H., & Luo, D. Y. (2019). Magnetic stimulation for female patients with stress urinary incontinence, a meta-analysis of studies with short-term follow-up. Medicine (United States), 98(19). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free