Barriers and Openings for Transforming Swedish Planning Practice–Examples of Landscape and Health Policy Integration

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines how key actors think and act in everyday planning practice when new policies are introduced. Drawing on frame theory, an analytical lens is developed for explaining mechanisms that restrain and promote policy-driven transformation in practice. The analysis focuses on current practice and Swedish planning practitioners’ experience of the integration of recently introduced policies on landscape and health. A key finding is that well-established perceptions of responsibility can hamper policy integration–even in cases where practitioners see benefits to planning outcomes of acting differently. Another key finding is that policies reframing landscape and health as holistic and relational can make individual practitioners question current practice, thereby opening the way for transformation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kågström, M., & Dovlén, S. (2019). Barriers and Openings for Transforming Swedish Planning Practice–Examples of Landscape and Health Policy Integration. Planning Theory and Practice, 20(4), 494–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1653958

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free