Biological mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A review of the clinical evidence

33Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of biological meshes seems to be an innovation that influences all surgical fields. The existing evidence indicates that biological meshes cannot only be applied on the area of hernia repair, but also on cases of abdominal reconstruction and pelvic organ prolapse treatment, especially in the presence of contaminated or potentially contaminated surgical fields. Low risks of graft rejection, complications, and infection seem to be the main advantages of biological meshes in comparison with the synthetic nonabsorbable ones. Nevertheless, the elevated costs suggest that biological mesh implantation should be evaluated in correlation to the needs of each clinical case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peppas, G., Gkegkes, I. D., Makris, M. C., & Falagas, M. E. (2010, November). Biological mesh in hernia repair, abdominal wall defects, and reconstruction and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A review of the clinical evidence. American Surgeon. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481007601134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free