Guidelines for Qualitative Research in Organization Studies: Controversy and Possibilities

  • Cavalcanti M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the present article is to tackle the controversy of establishing guidelines for qualitative research in Organization and Management Theory (OMT) and to present a summary of suggestions on how to conduct good qualitative research given by methodologists on top-tier international publications. In order to do so, the article discusses: general guidelines for qualitative research; how to achieve coherence and transparency in a qualitative empirical study; the meaning and importance of the concept of reflexivity; and, finally how to establish a theoretical contribution and transferability of findings in such context. The work presents a valuable contribution because such guidelines, concepts, and approaches can be adopted by students and researchers when conducting a qualitative research proposal, and by periodic reviewers to evaluate the quality of existing empirical studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cavalcanti, M. F. R. (2017). Guidelines for Qualitative Research in Organization Studies: Controversy and Possibilities. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 18(3), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2017.v18n3.522

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free