Identification in global and virtual teams: a systematic literature review

3Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research on team identification highlights its critical role in effective teamwork, especially in global and virtual teams. Despite its significance, the fragmented nature of existing studies, with studies conducted across varied contexts, limits a cohesive understanding of the phenomenon. Given the complexities of team identification in global and virtual settings, further research is necessary to examine how unique challenges within these environments modify the impact of identification compared to traditional teams. To address this gap, this study employs a systematic literature review, conducting a thematic analysis of 45 articles to categorize research into three distinct team categories: (1) monocultural teams with virtual meeting environments; (2) multicultural teams with non-virtual meeting environments; and (3) multicultural teams with virtual meeting environments. These categories are examined comprehensively to analyze identification development and outcomes across global and virtual teams. Subsequently, they are integrated into a cohesive framework that explains identification’s role within global and virtual teams. The framework highlights the fragmented yet progressive nature of existing research and identifies promising directions for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Do, H. T. K. (2026, March 1). Identification in global and virtual teams: a systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00890-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free